<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lies, Damned Lies: Lie to Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.extratextual.tv/2009/01/lies-damned-lies-lie-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.extratextual.tv/2009/01/lies-damned-lies-lie-to-me/</link>
	<description>Up The Content Stream Without A Paddle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 11:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Nightingale</title>
		<link>http://www.extratextual.tv/2009/01/lies-damned-lies-lie-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Nightingale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extratextual.tv/?p=287#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with your analysis Jon...I missed the first episode here in Australia but when alerted that the program used Ekman&#039;s facial expression analysis, tried to watch the second episode. I&#039;m afraid I couldn&#039;t sit it out...as you point out the plot undoes itself...and the preachy tone is really unbearable. The problem is that some of the more complex affect dynamics (like affect scripting) would have to be introduced to make the show really interesting, but that could compromise the basically deductive premise on which the show is built..i.e. that eye twitches and nostril flares betray falsity in testimonies. It&#039;s just not good TV...and I really wanted it to be good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with your analysis Jon&#8230;I missed the first episode here in Australia but when alerted that the program used Ekman&#8217;s facial expression analysis, tried to watch the second episode. I&#8217;m afraid I couldn&#8217;t sit it out&#8230;as you point out the plot undoes itself&#8230;and the preachy tone is really unbearable. The problem is that some of the more complex affect dynamics (like affect scripting) would have to be introduced to make the show really interesting, but that could compromise the basically deductive premise on which the show is built..i.e. that eye twitches and nostril flares betray falsity in testimonies. It&#8217;s just not good TV&#8230;and I really wanted it to be good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.extratextual.tv/2009/01/lies-damned-lies-lie-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extratextual.tv/?p=287#comment-951</guid>
		<description>oh, lighten up. I know the difference, and was just playing around. For the record, though, they&#039;re not &quot;completely unrelated&quot; -- common ownership is not complete unrelation, especially when the owner in question has proven himself eager to play politics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, lighten up. I know the difference, and was just playing around. For the record, though, they&#8217;re not &#8220;completely unrelated&#8221; &#8212; common ownership is not complete unrelation, especially when the owner in question has proven himself eager to play politics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart</title>
		<link>http://www.extratextual.tv/2009/01/lies-damned-lies-lie-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.extratextual.tv/?p=287#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Fox News and the Fox networks are completely unrelated.I know that you&#039;re trying to be clever, but you&#039;re just showing how little you understand the business of television.

But the show is so poorly written and so obvious that I&#039;ll click off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News and the Fox networks are completely unrelated.I know that you&#8217;re trying to be clever, but you&#8217;re just showing how little you understand the business of television.</p>
<p>But the show is so poorly written and so obvious that I&#8217;ll click off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

